Importing lots of rows :-)

Simon,
Try using SqlBulkCopy object (ado.net 2.0).
AMB
"Simon Harvey" wrote:

> Hi All,
> I'm not sure how to approach this problem so if anyone could advise me
> how to do it I would be very grateful.
> I have an app that calls a web service. The webservice returns an array
> of business objects.
> So I have a collections of objects that might be, say, 10000 objects in
> size.
> I need to import all the business objects into an SQL Server 2005
> database. The only way I know how to do this is to loop through each
> object and call a stored procedure repeatedly that takes the appropriate
> parameters. The whole import must be atomic. That is, if something goes
> wrong, the whole import needs to be aborted.
> I guess I have two questions:
> 1. Is repeatedly calling a stored procedure the best way to do this sort
> of stuff? I know doing imports like this must be a pretty common
> operation, but I don't know if using an SPROC is a dumb idea.
> 2. Is it ok to start a transaction and repeatedly call a SPROC, like,
> 10000 times? Is there a better what to go about this?
> Maybe I'm worrying about nothing - but it just "feels" wrong to be
> repeatedly calling an SPROC 10,000 times! :-) I was wondering if there
> is a more elegant way?
> Any advice anyone could offer would be very much appreciated.
> Kindest Regards
> Simon
>You're right. You don't want to call the same stored procedure 10,000 times
if there is way to accomplish the task as one unit of work. First off,
calling the stored procedure 10,000 times -while inside a transaction, will
consume and hold more resources longer than necessary.
Look into SQLBulkCopy as Alejandro offered
Arnie Rowland, YACE*
"To be successful, your heart must accompany your knowledge."
*Yet Another certification Exam
"Simon Harvey" <nothanks@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:ezy9dt4mGHA.732@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> Hi All,
> I'm not sure how to approach this problem so if anyone could advise me how
> to do it I would be very grateful.
> I have an app that calls a web service. The webservice returns an array of
> business objects.
> So I have a collections of objects that might be, say, 10000 objects in
> size.
> I need to import all the business objects into an SQL Server 2005
> database. The only way I know how to do this is to loop through each
> object and call a stored procedure repeatedly that takes the appropriate
> parameters. The whole import must be atomic. That is, if something goes
> wrong, the whole import needs to be aborted.
> I guess I have two questions:
> 1. Is repeatedly calling a stored procedure the best way to do this sort
> of stuff? I know doing imports like this must be a pretty common
> operation, but I don't know if using an SPROC is a dumb idea.
> 2. Is it ok to start a transaction and repeatedly call a SPROC, like,
> 10000 times? Is there a better what to go about this?
> Maybe I'm worrying about nothing - but it just "feels" wrong to be
> repeatedly calling an SPROC 10,000 times! :-) I was wondering if there is
> a more elegant way?
> Any advice anyone could offer would be very much appreciated.
> Kindest Regards
> Simon|||If your data is coming in as one large XML document, XML Bulk Load might be
another alternative. The final result is the same as SQLBulkCopy but the
input is an XML document.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
Use of included script samples are subject to the terms specified at
http://www.microsoft.com/info/cpyright.htm
"Arnie Rowland" <arnie@.1568.com> wrote in message
news:eyYZQd5mGHA.1204@.TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> You're right. You don't want to call the same stored procedure 10,000
> times if there is way to accomplish the task as one unit of work. First
> off, calling the stored procedure 10,000 times -while inside a
> transaction, will consume and hold more resources longer than necessary.
> Look into SQLBulkCopy as Alejandro offered
> --
> Arnie Rowland, YACE*
> "To be successful, your heart must accompany your knowledge."
> *Yet Another certification Exam
>
> "Simon Harvey" <nothanks@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:ezy9dt4mGHA.732@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>|||Hi All,
I'm not sure how to approach this problem so if anyone could advise me
how to do it I would be very grateful.
I have an app that calls a web service. The webservice returns an array
of business objects.
So I have a collections of objects that might be, say, 10000 objects in
size.
I need to import all the business objects into an SQL Server 2005
database. The only way I know how to do this is to loop through each
object and call a stored procedure repeatedly that takes the appropriate
parameters. The whole import must be atomic. That is, if something goes
wrong, the whole import needs to be aborted.
I guess I have two questions:
1. Is repeatedly calling a stored procedure the best way to do this sort
of stuff? I know doing imports like this must be a pretty common
operation, but I don't know if using an SPROC is a dumb idea.
2. Is it ok to start a transaction and repeatedly call a SPROC, like,
10000 times? Is there a better what to go about this?
Maybe I'm worrying about nothing - but it just "feels" wrong to be
repeatedly calling an SPROC 10,000 times! :-) I was wondering if there
is a more elegant way?
Any advice anyone could offer would be very much appreciated.
Kindest Regards
Simon|||Simon,
Try using SqlBulkCopy object (ado.net 2.0).
AMB
"Simon Harvey" wrote:

> Hi All,
> I'm not sure how to approach this problem so if anyone could advise me
> how to do it I would be very grateful.
> I have an app that calls a web service. The webservice returns an array
> of business objects.
> So I have a collections of objects that might be, say, 10000 objects in
> size.
> I need to import all the business objects into an SQL Server 2005
> database. The only way I know how to do this is to loop through each
> object and call a stored procedure repeatedly that takes the appropriate
> parameters. The whole import must be atomic. That is, if something goes
> wrong, the whole import needs to be aborted.
> I guess I have two questions:
> 1. Is repeatedly calling a stored procedure the best way to do this sort
> of stuff? I know doing imports like this must be a pretty common
> operation, but I don't know if using an SPROC is a dumb idea.
> 2. Is it ok to start a transaction and repeatedly call a SPROC, like,
> 10000 times? Is there a better what to go about this?
> Maybe I'm worrying about nothing - but it just "feels" wrong to be
> repeatedly calling an SPROC 10,000 times! :-) I was wondering if there
> is a more elegant way?
> Any advice anyone could offer would be very much appreciated.
> Kindest Regards
> Simon
>|||You're right. You don't want to call the same stored procedure 10,000 times
if there is way to accomplish the task as one unit of work. First off,
calling the stored procedure 10,000 times -while inside a transaction, will
consume and hold more resources longer than necessary.
Look into SQLBulkCopy as Alejandro offered
Arnie Rowland, YACE*
"To be successful, your heart must accompany your knowledge."
*Yet Another certification Exam
"Simon Harvey" <nothanks@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:ezy9dt4mGHA.732@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> Hi All,
> I'm not sure how to approach this problem so if anyone could advise me how
> to do it I would be very grateful.
> I have an app that calls a web service. The webservice returns an array of
> business objects.
> So I have a collections of objects that might be, say, 10000 objects in
> size.
> I need to import all the business objects into an SQL Server 2005
> database. The only way I know how to do this is to loop through each
> object and call a stored procedure repeatedly that takes the appropriate
> parameters. The whole import must be atomic. That is, if something goes
> wrong, the whole import needs to be aborted.
> I guess I have two questions:
> 1. Is repeatedly calling a stored procedure the best way to do this sort
> of stuff? I know doing imports like this must be a pretty common
> operation, but I don't know if using an SPROC is a dumb idea.
> 2. Is it ok to start a transaction and repeatedly call a SPROC, like,
> 10000 times? Is there a better what to go about this?
> Maybe I'm worrying about nothing - but it just "feels" wrong to be
> repeatedly calling an SPROC 10,000 times! :-) I was wondering if there is
> a more elegant way?
> Any advice anyone could offer would be very much appreciated.
> Kindest Regards
> Simon|||If your data is coming in as one large XML document, XML Bulk Load might be
another alternative. The final result is the same as SQLBulkCopy but the
input is an XML document.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
Use of included script samples are subject to the terms specified at
http://www.microsoft.com/info/cpyright.htm
"Arnie Rowland" <arnie@.1568.com> wrote in message
news:eyYZQd5mGHA.1204@.TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> You're right. You don't want to call the same stored procedure 10,000
> times if there is way to accomplish the task as one unit of work. First
> off, calling the stored procedure 10,000 times -while inside a
> transaction, will consume and hold more resources longer than necessary.
> Look into SQLBulkCopy as Alejandro offered
> --
> Arnie Rowland, YACE*
> "To be successful, your heart must accompany your knowledge."
> *Yet Another certification Exam
>
> "Simon Harvey" <nothanks@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:ezy9dt4mGHA.732@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>|||Thanks guys!
That XML one seems even more interesting actually, although I'm guessing
it might be quite hard to set up the mappings. Especially seeing as the
data is quite hierarchichal in nature.
Many thanks for your advice!
Simon
Roger Wolter[MSFT] wrote:
> If your data is coming in as one large XML document, XML Bulk Load might b
e
> another alternative. The final result is the same as SQLBulkCopy but the
> input is an XML document.
>|||Thanks guys!
That XML one seems even more interesting actually, although I'm guessing
it might be quite hard to set up the mappings. Especially seeing as the
data is quite hierarchichal in nature.
Many thanks for your advice!
Simon
Roger Wolter[MSFT] wrote:
> If your data is coming in as one large XML document, XML Bulk Load might b
e
> another alternative. The final result is the same as SQLBulkCopy but the
> input is an XML document.
>

Importing Exchange Contacts to SQL

I have been trying to accomplish the same thing but have not been able to do
so in SQL. Were you able to accomplish this task?
"Terry" wrote:

> Hi everyone,
> We have a contacts database on SQL. but also a large number of users stori
ng
> contacts within Exchange.
> What I'd like to do is be able to extract Exchange Contact data, maybe on
a
> nightly basis, into SQL.
> What would be the best way to achieve this? Could i use a linked server?
> I've found various snippets of VBA, but nothing that looks like it could
> achieve what i need.
> Any ideas?
>
>http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/d...ado_objects.asp
This lists how to connect to exchange using ADO.
I did this once (and I don't claim this is the right way) to see if it was
possible.
MS access comes with a driver to link Exchange/outlook folders.
You can link the global address list under "address books".
Then import the contacts to SQL Server using DTS.
There are a few different ways I can think of doing this, the above simply
being the easiest (not the right way).
Simon Worth
"Sonya" <Sonya@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:19F1C665-AAAF-4F72-9ADB-6FAC7B3F85F5@.microsoft.com...
> I have been trying to accomplish the same thing but have not been able to
do
> so in SQL. Were you able to accomplish this task?
> "Terry" wrote:
>
storing
on a|||Simon,
Thank you. I'm not major programmer, I have some things but mostly in SQL
and some Active X scripting. Do I have to Visual Studio to use this code in
the link that you provided or can I use this in DTS ActiveX?
Thanks again for your response, I hope I can use it.
"Simon Worth" wrote:

> http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/d...ado_objects.asp
> This lists how to connect to exchange using ADO.
> I did this once (and I don't claim this is the right way) to see if it was
> possible.
> MS access comes with a driver to link Exchange/outlook folders.
> You can link the global address list under "address books".
> Then import the contacts to SQL Server using DTS.
> There are a few different ways I can think of doing this, the above simply
> being the easiest (not the right way).
> --
> Simon Worth
>
> "Sonya" <Sonya@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:19F1C665-AAAF-4F72-9ADB-6FAC7B3F85F5@.microsoft.com...
> do
> storing
> on a
>
>|||Oh another thought,
I want to be able to do this from the Server level, meaning being able to
pull the contacts from every user that is a member of a particular group.
Therefore, I'm hoping that this is something that I would not have log on to
every user's mailbox individually to export their contact folder.
"Simon Worth" wrote:

> http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/d...ado_objects.asp
> This lists how to connect to exchange using ADO.
> I did this once (and I don't claim this is the right way) to see if it was
> possible.
> MS access comes with a driver to link Exchange/outlook folders.
> You can link the global address list under "address books".
> Then import the contacts to SQL Server using DTS.
> There are a few different ways I can think of doing this, the above simply
> being the easiest (not the right way).
> --
> Simon Worth
>
> "Sonya" <Sonya@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:19F1C665-AAAF-4F72-9ADB-6FAC7B3F85F5@.microsoft.com...
> do
> storing
> on a
>
>